From: bkoike@sdcc13.ucsd.edu (Bryce Koike) Subject: Random Cyberpunk-esque Interview Date: 22 Apr 92 21:22:40 GMT (Author's Note: This is just fiction, not a representation of my own personal beliefs or opinions.) NewsNet 91 NewsGroup: Political Prostituation From: Peaches&Cream (Peaches#155@node1581999) Subject: Murder and the Cop, part 1 Date: 3/21/36 Origination: The Hack'n Chat (node 1581999) I was flipping the channels when I came across this little piece of information. I think it's quite pertinent to the current "discussion" that's been going on here. Taper (the guy who's doing this special) has four more parts to this and I'll be putting them up as quickly as I can. [text transmission follows] The following is a news special copied from the Atlantic News, March 19, 2036, written by Nicholas Taper: Throughout the years there have been various attempts to punish criminals. By the late 20th Century these attempts centered around the police -- a special elite force whose sole job is to enforce the various laws supported by the United States government. Raising crime rates, especially in gang-infested neighborhoods, suddenly pitted police against well-armed young men who often out- gunned the police. This turned very quickly from law enforcement to urban warfare. The great fall of 2005 put a temporary damper on this, but by 2020 the gang problem was back -- worse than ever. This article will neither go into the countless reasons or explanations for problems with urban warfare nor will it discuss solutions. Instead I would like to present a man who leads one of the most elite police task forces in America. This man is Elijah Warrington, the chief of the Southern Los Angeles police department. [Click here for QuickPic] Atlantic News: Mr. Warrington, you've been attacked on several occasions by various groups who claim that your methods are barbaric and inhumane. What do you have to say on this? Elijah Warrington: Do they live in SLA? I do. I grew up in these slums and got to see the hell this city breeds first-hand. Inhumane? This is the accepted form of retaliation here in SLA. If someone kills your gang brother, you don't head to the cops. You pick up a gun and kill. What we are doing is answering back in the language that the gangs know best. AN: But does that make your methods right? EW: The ends justifies the means in this case. A slap on the wrist isn't going to stop gang warfare here. You're going to have to talk back -- by force, if necessary. The whole of American society has held us, the American police force, responsible for the gang problem. We aren't the ones who are making the gangs, but it's the society that demands that we stop them. The groups who are blaming me for using barbaric police tactics are also the same ones who are refusing to do anything about it. Every day there's fewer care clinics here, fewer people who are trying to do something about the problem. The police are here to enforce the laws, not to solve domestic problems. There's counsellors and shrinks for that. AN: But what about people who aren't gang members? What about the fifty homeless men that were killed last year? Or the homeless children that were slaughtered during your supposedly routine city clean-up? EW: Look, there's over 6.3 billion people on this planet now. I can't even begin to imagine the fraction of those people that are harbored here in America now- AN: So you're saying that it's acceptable to kill these people because of the over-inflated population? EW: You cut me off, sir, please allow me to continue. Do you know the price it costs to rehabilitate a homeless man or woman? What about an orphaned child left in the street? The costs are enormous. Currently our country is spending less and less on people like this and more and more on the rich, those who are well off. The police force isn't responsible for rehabilitation, but WE are the ones who are having to deal with the drawbacks! Centers for helping orphaned, molested, or homeless kids are closing down right and left. Back in the 20th Century there was precious little people were doing for the homeless. Now there's even less. A large number of those homeless have mental problems that make it quite impossible for them to operate in today's society. There is NO ONE in this country who is willing to make an effort to see that these mentally deficient men and women get the help and support they need. The cost itself is staggering and pointless. Well over sixty percent of all kids who are pulled off the street for crime and sent to foster homes and the such are back on the street within two years or less. All the time and effort spent on these children is wasted in the end -- they go back into the criminal pool, or the drug pool, or the disease pool. It is impossible to care for these children because they don't want it. Ditto for adults in similar situations. How you do expect us to deal with this? We don't have the facilities or funding to actually help these kids and yet WE are the ones who gets the blame! I am having our department deal with this problem in a radical way. Yes, I'm definitely willing to accept that fact. But the other fact is that there is no other effective way of dealing with this problem. Jails do not rehabilitate criminals. Do you know that 35% of the people in our jails, drunk tanks, and holding cells right now are under 20 years of age? These are kids who need help but aren't EVER going to get it. The sad, simple truth is that it's better to remove these individuals from society before they get the chance to commit greater crimes and continue to infect our society. AN: But what about those who are innocent of such crimes? What about the homeless man who is killed just because an officer suspects him of being a criminal? EW: (sighs) Throughout history there have been the stories of the innocent man that gets the shaft. This is a fact of our justice system. We have no way of reading people's minds to get the truth out. We deal with what we have and go with it. This was the problem with the death penalty forty years ago and it's the same problem with it today. I don't begin to pretend that the killing we do is a deterrent. It is a cleansing of this city. I think you'll notice that SLA has had a drastic 10% decrease in crime over the past two years. This isn't some fluke -- you'll see similar decreases for the next five years. My system works because we're dealing with radical problems. I'd like to also point out that over 75% of the crimes in this city are gang-related. The vast majority of gang members carry guns. Are you suggesting that we risk the life of a law-abiding officer to make certain that someone really is a gang member? Gangs have arranged certain ambushes before to capture and kill certain officers of our force. We used to check to make certain that the people we killed were being killed for a specific reason and not just guilt by association. Unfortunately, that avenue is no longer open for us. When we get a call about a criminal violation, we must be prepared and ready to use maximum violent force to get the job done. AN: I don't think anyone can really ignore the effects your system, however frightening it may be, has had on crime in SLA. But the question is where are the numbers really coming from? Several SLA gangs have found their way up north to Northern California and even further up the west coast. Is your crime drop simply the product of a gang migration? It's obvious that SLA has the highest gang-kill ratio of any gang-infested city, so are the gangs simply leaving because of how deadly it is to live here? EW: To answer your questions, let me tell you a story. Last week I went back to the park by the house I grew up in. When I was a kid no one went to the parks except for the gangs. Weekly, if not more often, gang wars would break out there. There'd be drugs, illegal weapons, anything you can think of, trading hands there. People would be having sex right there underneath the trees next to the paths. Last week when I walked through it I saw a family having a picnic. The guy who works at the park thanked me for cleaning the city up and making the park a safe place for kids to play in. I don't care where the gangs are going. When I was brought into office here at the Southern Los Angeles police department, the people demanded that I clean up this city. I've been doing that. Don't get me wrong, I don't like the methods I've had to resort to. I've gone through the cemeteries and I've noticed that the graves from the past five years come close to outnumbering all the others two-to-one. That doesn't make me feel good. Not all of those graves are there because of my men and I, but I feel responsible for them all. But its the parks that remind me of why I do it. AN: Thank you, Elijah Warrington. And that is, as they say, straight from the horse's mouth. This is Nicholas Taper of the Atlanta News asking you to stay informed, stay armed, and stay safe. That's all I got. I only picked off the picture of the SLA police chief 'cuz I'm running out of space on my main drive, so I'm sorry that no one got all the stats and stuff that Taper was displaying during the dialogue. Taper's show's on channel 34 at 8:00pm for those interested. ()> Peaches 'n Cream <()